Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40538851›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in Germany using claims data.

Kathrin Hering, Thomas Kuhnt, Nils Kossack, Lena M Richter, Michael Schultze, Ulrike Osowski, Luisa Henkel, Ann-Christin Gaupel, Marie-Noelle Solbes, Bernard Zolyniak and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Inpatient morbidity and structural care burden in oropharyngeal carcinoma in Germany: a nationwide cross-institutional EHR analysis using an AI-enabled data network.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kathrin Hering *Department of Imaging and Radiation Medicine, Clinic of Radiooncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Thomas Kuhnt *Department of Imaging and Radiation Medicine, Clinic of Radiooncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Nils KossackWIG2 Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research, Leipzig, Germany.
Lena M RichterWIG2 Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research, Leipzig, Germany.
Michael SchultzeZEG - Berlin Center for Epidemiology and Health Research GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Ulrike OsowskiMerck Healthcare Germany GmbH, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Weiterstadt, Germany.
Luisa HenkelMerck Healthcare Germany GmbH, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Weiterstadt, Germany.
Ann-Christin GaupelMerck Healthcare Germany GmbH, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Weiterstadt, Germany.
Marie-Noelle SolbesMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Bernard ZolyniakMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Nancy SchoenherrMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Standard-of-care treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN) is surgery with consolidation chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or definitive CRT. There is a paucity of real-world evidence regarding current treatment patterns and downstream outcomes for LA SCCHN in German clinical practice. Methods: This study was a non-interventional, observational, retrospective cohort study of newly diagnosed patients with LA SCCHN using routinely collected claims data from a health insurance claims database in Germany (2016-2021). Claim records were used to describe the cohort, including incidence, characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival. As permitted by the data, descriptive analyses were stratified by index treatment (surgical resection or definitive non-surgical treatment), tumor site (oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx), and sex. The study was descriptive in nature; as such, no statistical comparisons were made. Results: The LA SCCHN cohort comprised 1,010 patients (827 male and 183 female patients), of whom 39.8% (402/1,010) received surgical resection and 60.2% (608/1,010) received definitive non-surgical treatment as part of index treatment. Patients with surgical resection as part of index treatment were characterized by a younger mean age and lower comorbidity indices. After index treatment, three-quarters (74.8%) of the study population received no subsequent SCCHN treatment. Index treatment was similar for male and female patients. The rate of surgical resection and definitive non-surgical treatment was similar in patients with oral cavity cancer [50.6% (128/253) and 49.4% (125/253), respectively]; all other tumor sites were treated more frequently (>60%) with definitive non-surgical treatment. The 5-year probability of survival for the overall population was 48.5% (95% CI: 44.4%-53.1%). Survival probabilities varied across tumor sites and by index treatment. Conclusion: Despite index treatment being broadly aligned to guideline recommendations, most patients did not receive a subsequent line of treatment and almost half of patients had died within 5 years. This highlights the urgent unmet need for improved treatment options for LA SCCHN.

Indexed as

chemotherapy with radiotherapydatabase analysishead and neck cancerlocally advancedoverall survivalreal-world evidenceresectionsquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID40538851
PMCPMC12177216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.