ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
A predictive model to identify optimal candidates for surgery among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To improve clinical decision-making, we developed a predictive model to identify metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who might benefit from primary tumor resection (PTR). Patients and Methods: We extracted clinical data of stage IV CRC patients between 2010 and 2019 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance confounding factors by categorizing patients into surgery and non-surgery groups. To identify independent predictors of cancer-specific survival (CSS), we used multivariate Cox regression analysis. We further sorted patients who underwent surgery into benefit and non-benefit groups based on the median CSS of the non-surgery group; subsequently, we split the groups into training and test sets at a ratio of 6:4. To construct predictive models, we used the Boruta selection method to further filter variables, focusing on whether patients benefited from the surgery, based on key predictive factors. Results: We identified 23,649 mCRC patients, of whom 80.97% (19,148) underwent PTR. After PSM, compared to no surgical intervention, surgical intervention was independently associated with an extended median CSS [median: 22 Conclusion: We achieved a predictive model which could identify optimal candidates for PTR among mCRC patients with high accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.