Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40538839›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Combination of ultrasound-based radiomics and deep learning with clinical data to predict response in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Wu Tenghui, Liu Xinyi, Si Ziyi, Zhang Yanting, Ma Ziqian, Zhu Yiwen, Gan Ling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wu Tenghui *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xiangyang No. 1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang, China.
Liu Xinyi *Department of Ultrasound, Xiangyang No.1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang, China.
Si ZiyiDepartment of Ultrasound, Xiangyang No.1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang, China.
Zhang YantingDepartment of Ultrasound, Xiangyang No.1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang, China.
Ma ZiqianDepartment of Oncology, The People's Hospital of Zouping City, Zouping, China.
Zhu YiwenDepartment of Ultrasound, Xiangyang No.1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang, China.
Gan LingDepartment of Ultrasound, Xiangyang No.1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Accurate assessment of NAC efficacy is crucial for determining appropriate surgical strategies and guiding the extent of surgical resection in breast cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to design an integrated predictive model combining ultrasound imaging, deep learning features, and clinical characteristics to predict pCR in breast cancer patients undergoing NAC. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted, including 643 pathologically confirmed breast cancer patients who underwent NAC between January 2022 to February 2024 from two institutions (Center 1: 372 cases; Center 2: 271 cases). Ultrasound images before and after NAC were collected for each patient. A total of 2,920 radiomics features and 4,096 deep learning features were extracted from the ultrasound images. Multiple machine learning algorithms were employed to model and validate the diagnostic performance of different types of features. Finally, clinical data, radiomics, and deep learning features were integrated to form a fusion model, which was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: The combined model achieved the highest predictive performance for pathological complete response (pCR) across both cohorts. In the internal validation cohort, it reached an accuracy of 0.892 (95% CI: 0.862-0.912) and an AUC of 0.901 (95% CI: 0.854-0.948). In the external cohort, it maintained strong performance with an accuracy of 0.857 (95% CI: 0.822-0.928) and an AUC of 0.891 (95% CI: 0.848-0.934), significantly outperforming the individual models (DeLong test, p < 0.01).The deep learning model showed solid performance with accuracies of 0.875 and 0.833 in the internal and external cohorts, respectively, and AUCs of 0.870 and 0.874. The radiomics model displayed moderate accuracy and AUC in both cohorts, while the clinical model showed the lowest predictive capability among the models, with accuracy and AUC values around 0.67 in both cohorts. Conclusions: The combined model, integrating clinical, radiomics, and deep learning features, demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients, outperforming individual models. This integrated approach highlights the value of combining diverse data types to improve prediction, offering a promising tool for guiding NAC response assessment and personalized treatment planning.

Indexed as

breast cancerdeep learningneoadjuvant chemotherapyradiomicsultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40538839
PMCPMC12176835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.