Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40538825›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in reproductive health2025

State-of-the-art approaches in the investigation of human seminal bacteriome using metagenomic methods.

Jan Hofman, Petra Brenerova, Petra Borilova Linhartova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jan HofmanRECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Petra BrenerovaRECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
Petra Borilova LinhartovaRECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the understanding of the causes of infertility is the key to its successful treatment, recent studies have shown that as many as 50% of male-caused infertility cases are considered idiopathic. The microbial colonization of the male reproductive system was shown to be associated with reduced male reproductive fitness. Investigation of the seminal microbiome, however, remains challenging. This article aimed to improve this situation by creating the first comprehensive review of literature on the metagenomic methods (including the pre-analytical and analytical approaches) used in the research on human seminal bacteriome (total bacterial DNA in the matrix), published in 2018-2024. A total of 29 studies addressing the analysis of the human seminal bacteriome were identified. The analysis typically involved DNA extraction from the supernatant using commercial kits, amplification of the gene for 16S rRNA, and sequencing of amplicons. Where the separation of seminal plasma was performed, centrifugation was the dominant method used for this purpose. The significant heterogeneity in individual steps of methodological approaches in the analysis of the human seminal bacteriome complicates the comparison of results among studies and the establishment of standard procedures, hindering clinical advancements. For this reason, a protocol for the analysis of the human seminal plasma bacteriome is proposed here, which could lead to improved comparability of results among studies and make future research more efficient. This protocol is founded on rigorous quality control measures, compliance with the WHO laboratory manual for sample collection, extensive pretreatment involving mechanical and enzymatic lysis, DNA extraction using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen), and short-read sequencing conducted on the MiSeq platform (Illumina).

Indexed as

bacteriomebacteriospermiaejaculatefertilitymethodologysemenspermspermiogram

Identifiers

PMID40538825
PMCPMC12176750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.