ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Association between weekend catch-up sleep and glycemic control among individuals with diabetes: a population-based study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Weekend catch-up sleep (WCUS), a compensation for insufficient sleep during weekdays, was associated with desirable metabolic effects. However, its relationship with glycemic control among adults with diabetes was not fully established. Methods: Participants from the 2017-2018 cycle of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were included for analysis. WCUS was defined as a difference in sleep duration between weekends and weekdays of more than one hour. Glycemic control was assessed by hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose levels. Poor glycemic control was defined as an HbA1c level exceeding 10.0%. Results: The final analysis included 571 participants (weighted number: 38,714,135), and 24.90% of them practicing WCUS. No significant association was found between glycemic control and the presence of WCUS. However, significant negative associations were noted between WCUS with a duration of 1-2 hours and HbA1c level [β= -0.82, 95% CI: (-1.34, -0.30), P=0.004] and fasting glucose level [β= -1.67, 95% CI: (-2.51, -0.82), P<0.001] when compared with participants with no WCUS, which remained consistent across different subgroups. In addition, it was also associated with a reduced risk of developing poor glycemic control (OR=0.10, 95% CI: (0.01, 0.60), P=0.015). With WCUS duration of ≥ 2 hours, such associations became not significant. Conclusions: WCUS for 1-2 hours was associated with lower levels of HbA1c and fasting glucose and reduced risk of developing poor glycemic control, while a duration of ≥ 2 hours was not. Further research is needed to determine the optimal duration of WCUS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.