ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Heart sound classification based on convolutional neural network with convolutional block attention module.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kullback-Leibler divergence in feature selection: a methodology for improved detection of heart valve disorders.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- An empirical comparison of deep CNN architectures for heart sound classification from phonocardiogram signals.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain a leading cause of global mortality, underscoring the need for accurate and efficient diagnostic tools. This study presents an enhanced heart sound classification framework based on a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) integrated with the Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM). Heart sound recordings from the PhysioNet CinC 2016 dataset were segmented and transformed into spectrograms, and twelve CNN models with varying CBAM configurations were systematically evaluated. Experimental results demonstrate that selectively integrating CBAM into early and mid-level convolutional blocks significantly improves classification performance. The optimal model, with CBAM applied after Conv Blocks 1-1, 1-2, and 2-1, achieved an accuracy of 98.66%, outperforming existing state-of-the-art methods. Additional validation using an independent test set from the PhysioNet 2022 database confirmed the model's generalization capability, achieving an accuracy of 95.6% and an AUC of 96.29%. Furthermore, T-SNE visualizations revealed clear class separation, highlighting the model's ability to extract highly discriminative features. These findings confirm the efficacy of attention-based architectures in medical signal classification and support their potential for real-world clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.