Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40538722›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Foot-and-mouth disease reproduction number: a scoping review.

Umanga Gunasekera, Kimberly VanderWaal, Jonathan Arzt, Andres Perez

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Umanga GunasekeraDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States.
Kimberly VanderWaalDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States.
Jonathan ArztForeign Animal Disease Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Plum Island Animal Disease Center, National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility, Greenport, NY, United States.
Andres PerezDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Approximately two-thirds of the countries worldwide are considered to be foot and-mouth disease (FMD) infected according to the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH). The effective reproduction number (Re) is an important indicator to assess disease spread and evaluate the impact of preventive and control measures for FMD and other infectious diseases. Re is defined as the number of secondary infections caused by one infected animal in a susceptible population, accounting for maternal immunity, immunity from previous infections, and vaccination. When estimated at the farm/ herd level or above, this parameter is identified with terms such as Rh or Rf (commonly identified as R in this study). Methods: This study reviews the values of R estimated for FMD globally using empirical data at the farm/herd level or above. The population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) criteria were used to search different databases and to identify relevant studies, resulting in the identification of 10 peer-reviewed articles from eight different countries within the past 20 years (1994-2024). Results and discussion: Regardless of the diversity of epidemiological scenarios, the R-value of FMD remained from 0 to 13.3 with a median value of 1.68 for above farm level transmission. Results here summarize the expected range of values for R under different epidemiological conditions, contributing to the design and evaluation of prevention and control strategies and, ultimately, mitigating the impact of one of the most impactful livestock diseases worldwide. This review highlights the necessity of further studies due to a limited number of studies calculating R for FMD using empirical data.

Indexed as

endemicepidemicepidemiologyfoot and mouth diseasereproductive number

Identifiers

PMID40538722
PMCPMC12177884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.