ArticleCureus2025
The Diagnostic Odyssey of Dissociative Identity Disorder: A Case Report of Prolonged Misrecognition.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electroconvulsive therapy in an adolescent with dissociative identity disorder and depression: a case report.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dissociative identity disorder (DID) is characterised by two or more distinct personality states, often resulting from severe childhood trauma. The disorder is frequently misdiagnosed as depression, anxiety, or borderline personality disorder. This case study is regarding a 28-year-old Caucasian woman with mental health challenges since primary school, including a bullying and domestic violence history, who received multiple incorrect diagnoses (depression, anxiety, panic disorder) given by various psychiatrists, psychologists and general practitioners over several years. Patient treatment with tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors failed to produce any improvements. At age 16, a specialist general practitioner considered the former diagnoses were incorrect and recognised the need for multidisciplinary assessment, leading to referral to a specific psychiatry diagnostic service at a tertiary teaching hospital, where she was correctly diagnosed with DID. Psychologists with a special interest in DID provided the patient with intensive psychotherapy sessions. Her 12-year journey through therapy resulted in significant mental health recovery in addition to finishing her university degree and obtaining a job. This case highlights the importance of recognising DID, challenges in differential diagnosis, and the need for specialised multidisciplinary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.