Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40538674›Full record

ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2025

Barriers to Routine Gynecological Care in Young Adult Females in the United States.

Anne M Clark, Mireya C Long, Brianna M Magnusson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne M ClarkNeuroscience Center, College of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.
Mireya C LongDepartment of Public Health, College of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.
Brianna M MagnussonDepartment of Public Health, College of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Well-woman exams (WWEs) are important preventive health care; however, many do not regularly receive these exams. Understanding barriers to timely care is important in improving health care delivery and health outcomes. Methods: We conducted a panel survey of 1000 U.S. females 18-30 years of age. Barriers to gynecological care were assessed in four domains: financial, practical, procedural, and health care provider related. Differences between groups were assessed using Results: Respondents were on an average 24.5 years old and the majority were White, non-Hispanic (63%). Respondents were categorized by WWE screening status: never screened (24%), delayed screening (>1 year) (30%), and on-time screening (46%). Those who had delayed WWE expressed higher practical, procedural, and provider barriers compared with those with on-time exams. After adjusting for other barrier types and sociodemographic characteristics, lack of insurance was associated with more than twice the odds of delayed WWE (odds ratio [OR]: 2.61 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-4.92) and a one-point increase in the provider barriers mean scale was associated with nearly 60% increased odds (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.16-2.17) of having delayed WWE. Conclusions: The patient experience with the health care provider, along with insurance coverage, is significantly associated with delayed WWE. These results indicate that in the presence of insurance coverage, providers have a significant role in creating an environment that supports the timeliness of WWE in young adult patients.

Indexed as

patient–provider relationspreventative health serviceswell-woman visitwomen’s health services

Identifiers

PMID40538674
PMCPMC12177321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.