ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2025
Experiences and Preferences Reported with an At-Home Self-Collection Device Compared with In-Clinic Speculum-Based Cervical Cancer Screening in the United States.
Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing Cervical Cancer Screening Disparities: At-Home Self-Collection Among LGBQ+ Populations.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterTrial
- HPV-Driven Cervical Carcinogenesis: Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms and Diagnostic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Delivering HPV results via telehealth: Patient needs and engagement following an at-home self-collection study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vaginal self-collection offers an effective option for cervical cancer (CC) screening that can improve screening experiences and engagement. Objective: This article presents data from a multi-center pilot study ( Study Design: Participants were screened with a self-collection device and a clinician-collection. They provided feedback about their experiences via usability and preference surveys. Results: Significantly more participants reported pain ( Conclusion: By improving screening experiences and accessibility, at-home self-collection can increase screening participation and accelerate progress toward eliminating CC as a public health concern in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.