ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Efficacy of individualized orelabrutinib-based regimens in relapsed or refractory central nervous system lymphoma.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety and clinical outcomes of orelabrutinib, lenalidomide plus sintilimab for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Relapsed or refractory central nervous system lymphoma (rrCNSL) lacks established preferred treatment and carries an inferior prognosis. Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) showed promising effectiveness. Orelabrutinib is a second-generation BTKi with a high concentration in cerebrospinal fluid. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, the outcomes of 37 relapsed or refractory central nervous system diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients who received orelabrutinib, high-dose methotrexate, ifosfamide, etoposide, and dexamethasone (Ore-MIED) or orelabrutinib, high-dose methotrexate, temozolomide and dexamethasone (Ore-MTD) were evaluated. Results: Of the 37 patients included, 11 received Ore-MTD, and 26 received the Ore-MIED regimen. The overall response rate in our cohort was 89.2%, with complete remission achieved in 51.4% of patients and partial remission in 37.8% of patients. The median progression-free survival was observed to be 7.0 months. No statistically significant difference was found in the median progression-free survival between patients receiving different treatment regimens (5.0 months for Ore-MTD versus 13.0 months for Ore-MIED; Conclusion: Our study confirms the effectiveness and safety of Ore-MIED/Ore-MTD in rrCNSL patients, even in those with previous exposure to multiple lines of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.