ArticleJournal of hand and microsurgery2025
Pillar pain incidence, duration, and psychological correlations in WALANT. A prospective study of 170 patients.
Article in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Intraoperative pillar corticosteroid injection": does it improve clinical outcomes after carpal tunnel release surgery? A double-blind, randomized controlled study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Trial
- Pillar pain after carpal tunnel release: an evidence-based review of pathophysiology, diagnostic strategies, and a structured clinical decision-making framework.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To prospectively address our patients seeking carpal tunnel release (CTR) to evaluate the incidence, intensity, and duration of pillar pain (PP) and its correlation with catastrophic thinking, depression, and health anxiety.Methods: this is a prospective cohort study consisting of patients who underwent mini-open CTR under WALANT. Pillar pain was evaluated using the table test and was recorded as dichotomous variable and rated with a visual analogue scale (VAS). Patients with a positive result were evaluated on a monthly basis until the test yielded a negative result.To assess catastrophic thinking, health anxiety and depression levels, we employed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) the Short Health Anxiety Inventory (SHAI), and the Beck scale respectively. Results: The study enrolled 170 patients who underwent CTR using WALANT technique. Among them, 84 patients (49 %) exhibited a positive table test. With exception of age and diabetes, both groups showed comparable demographic characteristics.The mean pain score for patients with a positive test was 3.5 ± 1.5, and the median duration of it was 3 months (interquartile range [IQR] 2-4). The median PCS score was 8 (IQR 2-14) in patients without PP, compared to 8 (IQR 4-11) in patients with PP. In the logistic regression model, the PCS variable had a crude odds ratio (OR) of 1 (95 % CI: 0.96-1.03) and an adjusted OR of 1 (95 % CI: 0.97-1.04). The SHAI score showed a crude OR of 0.97 (95 % CI: 0.93-1.01) and an adjusted OR of 0.97 (95 % CI: 0.92-1.01). The BECK score had a crude OR of 0.99 (95 % CI: 0.96-1.03) and an adjusted OR of 1.02 (95 % CI: 0.98-1.06). Conclusion: Patients undergoing mini-open CTR have a risk of 49 % of experiencing PP, which typically registers a pain intensity of approximately 3 points and will last for a median of 3 months. The likelihood of experience it does not depend on catastrophic thinking, depression, and health anxiety. Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.