Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40538572›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2025

The development and use of data warehousing in clinical settings: a scoping review.

Shiyang Lyu, Simon Craig, Gerard O'Reilly, David Taniar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shiyang LyuSoftware Systems and Cybersecurity Department, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Simon CraigPaediatric Emergency Department, Monash Medical Centre, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Gerard O'ReillyEmergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
David TaniarSoftware Systems and Cybersecurity Department, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The emergence of data warehousing in clinical settings has greatly enhanced data analysis capabilities, facilitating the accurate and comprehensive extraction of valuable information. This scoping review explores the contributions of data warehouses in clinical settings by analysing the strengths, challenges and implications of each type of data warehouse, with a particular focus on general and specialised types. Methods: This scoping review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and IEEE-Xplore), identifying peer-reviewed, English-language studies from 1st January 2014 to 1st January 2024, that focus on data warehousing in healthcare, covering either general or specialised data warehouse applications. Python programming was used to extract the search results and transform the data into a tabular format for analysis. Results: After removing 1,194 duplicates, 4,864 unique papers remained. Abstract screening excluded 4,590 as irrelevant, leaving 274 for full-text evaluation. In total, 27 papers met the inclusion criteria, of which 17 focused on general data warehouses and 10 on specialised data warehouses.General data warehouses were found to be primarily used to address data integration issues, particularly for electronic health record (EHR)/ Electronic medical Record (EMR) and general clinical data. These warehouses typically use a star schema architecture with online analytical processing (OLAP) and query analysis capabilities. In contrast, specialised data warehouses were focused on improving the quality of decision support by handling a wide range of data specific to diseases, using specialised architectures and advanced artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities to address the unique and complex challenges associated with these tasks. Conclusions: General purpose data warehouses effectively integrate disparate data sources to provide a comprehensive view of disease management, patient care, and resource management. However, their flexibility and analytical capabilities need improvement. In contrast, specialised data warehouses are gaining popularity for their focus on specific diseases or research purposes, using advanced tools such as data mining and AI for superior analytical performance. Despite their innovative designs, these specialised warehouses face scalability challenges due to their customised nature. Addressing these challenges with advanced analytics and flexible architectures is critical.

Indexed as

clinical systemsdata warehousedigital healthhealthcarehospital data systems

Identifiers

PMID40538572
PMCPMC12176853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.