ReviewFrontiers in digital health2025
The development and use of data warehousing in clinical settings: a scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building the adult growth hormone deficiency data mart: a Real-World model of AI-driven clinical data extraction in a single Italian center.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Data capture, collection, management, and storage systems for clinical research: A scoping review protocol.PloS one · 2026Article
- Data warehousing in healthcare: enhancing resource allocation and decision-making in Botswana.Oxford open digital health · 2026Article
- Mapping antimicrobial resistance and healthcare-associated infections indicators for actionable benchmarking: a cross-network overview in a data-driven era.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Review
- Building a healthcare data warehouse: considerations, opportunities, and challenges.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The emergence of data warehousing in clinical settings has greatly enhanced data analysis capabilities, facilitating the accurate and comprehensive extraction of valuable information. This scoping review explores the contributions of data warehouses in clinical settings by analysing the strengths, challenges and implications of each type of data warehouse, with a particular focus on general and specialised types. Methods: This scoping review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and IEEE-Xplore), identifying peer-reviewed, English-language studies from 1st January 2014 to 1st January 2024, that focus on data warehousing in healthcare, covering either general or specialised data warehouse applications. Python programming was used to extract the search results and transform the data into a tabular format for analysis. Results: After removing 1,194 duplicates, 4,864 unique papers remained. Abstract screening excluded 4,590 as irrelevant, leaving 274 for full-text evaluation. In total, 27 papers met the inclusion criteria, of which 17 focused on general data warehouses and 10 on specialised data warehouses.General data warehouses were found to be primarily used to address data integration issues, particularly for electronic health record (EHR)/ Electronic medical Record (EMR) and general clinical data. These warehouses typically use a star schema architecture with online analytical processing (OLAP) and query analysis capabilities. In contrast, specialised data warehouses were focused on improving the quality of decision support by handling a wide range of data specific to diseases, using specialised architectures and advanced artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities to address the unique and complex challenges associated with these tasks. Conclusions: General purpose data warehouses effectively integrate disparate data sources to provide a comprehensive view of disease management, patient care, and resource management. However, their flexibility and analytical capabilities need improvement. In contrast, specialised data warehouses are gaining popularity for their focus on specific diseases or research purposes, using advanced tools such as data mining and AI for superior analytical performance. Despite their innovative designs, these specialised warehouses face scalability challenges due to their customised nature. Addressing these challenges with advanced analytics and flexible architectures is critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.