ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Real-world treatment persistence and predictive factors for discontinuation of antifibrotic therapies in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comparative Assessment of the Antifibrotic Effect of Nintedanib Administered via a Medicated Diet or Oral Gavage in a Rat Model of Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Real-world persistence with antifibrotic treatments: a nationwide study on claims data in France (The REPEAT study).Respiratory research · 2026Observational
- [Evolving management of SARD-ILD : Current challenges and emerging treatment options for rheumatoid-associated interstitial lung diseases].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2026Review
- Treatment Adherence and Persistence of Anti-Fibrotic Drugs in Real Life in Greece.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Persistence with antifibrotic medications in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is crucial for long-term outcomes. However, real-world data regarding treatment persistence patterns in IPF are scarce. Methods: We conducted a Results: Overall, 808 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 278 subjects (34.4%) discontinued therapy over a median follow-up of 16 (8-24) months. The proportion of patients discontinuing therapy was comparable between pirfenidone and nintedanib (37.5% vs. 32.5% respectively; p = 0.15). Additionally, no statistical difference was observed between antifibrotic agents in the distribution of time until treatment discontinuation (log-rank test, p = 0.3). Predictive factors associated with the probability of treatment discontinuation included age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.05), body mass index (BMI, HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.94-0.99), transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide (TLco)% predicted (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99), Gender-Age-Physiology (GAP) index score (HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.18-1.42), use of long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) (HR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.28-2.27) and intermittent dosing adjustment (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.29-2.15). Conclusion: In this large population-based cohort of patients with IPF, around one-third discontinued antifibrotics during a study follow-up with no difference in the rates and time to discontinuation between pirfenidone and nintedanib. Clinical predictive factors including age, BMI, TLco% predicted, GAP index score, use of LTOT and intermittent dosing adjustment were associated with the risk of treatment discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.