ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025
Early intensive blood pressure management after endovascular treatment in ischaemic stroke (IDENTIFY): a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Control After Endovascular Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Pooled it
- Personalized Blood Pressure Targeting After Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA neurology · 2026Trial
- Systolic blood pressure targets after successful endovascular thrombectomy: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Delayed Intracranial Hemorrhage after Endovascular Thrombectomy Is Associated With Poor Functional Outcomes and Elevated Systolic Blood Pressure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Intensive Versus Standard Systolic Blood Pressure Targets Following Successful Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review With Frequentist and Bayesian Meta-Analysis.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Intensive versus standard blood pressure management after endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- The association of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein-triglyceride glucose index with functional outcome in elderly patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing intravenous thrombolysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Observational
- Association Between Hyperacute Blood Pressure Lowering and Outcomes in Patients With Endovascular Thrombectomy.Journal of stroke · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The optimal blood pressure (BP) management following successful endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients remains unclear. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of intensive BP control in AIS patients who had received EVT within 6 h. Methods: This randomised, multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint clinical trial (ChiCTR2200057770) was conducted at 63 stroke centres in China. Eligible participants had AIS due to large vessel occlusion in anterior circulation, underwent EVT within 6 h, and achieved successful recanalisation. Patients were randomised to intensive (systolic BP target <130 mm Hg) or standard (systolic BP target <180 mm Hg) management, maintained until 24 h post-EVT. The primary outcome was unfavourable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 3-6) at 90 days. The trial was terminated following a neutral interim analysis results and publication of counterpart randomised trials. Findings: Between October 14, 2022 and March 18, 2024, 383 patients were randomised. Unfavourable functional outcome occurred in 71.0% (130/183) of the intensive-management group and 67.5% (135/200) of the standard-management group (risk ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.92-1.20; p = 0.45). There was no significant difference in symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage, malignant brain oedema, or all-cause death at 90 days. Interpretation: Intensive BP management to <130 mm Hg did not improve outcomes in AIS patients undergoing EVT within 6 h and achieved successful recanalisation. The optimal BP management strategies require further investigation. Funding: Sichuan University West China Hospital, National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key R&D Programme of China, and Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.