ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Forgetting phenomena in the Iowa Gambling Task: a new computational model among diverse participants.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) is a widely used paradigm for evaluating decision-making and executive functioning, yet existing computational models seldom account for the phenomenon of forgetting, which is critical to understanding dynamic decision processes. Methods: We developed the Exploitation and Exploration with Forgetting (EEF) model, which integrates a dynamic forgetting parameter (λ) and participants' first-choice priors into a unified reinforcement-learning framework. The EEF model was fitted to choice data from 504 healthy individuals performing the standard 100-trial IGT. Model performance was assessed via goodness-of-fit comparisons (BIC/AIC/Free Energy), parameter- and model-recovery simulations, and behavioral validation. Results: Across multiple cohorts, the EEF model achieved superior fit relative to five established models. We introduce two novel metrics-Sequential Exploration Decay (SED) and Forgetting Interval (FI)-to quantify how forgetting shapes exploratory behavior. The EEF model's SED and FI values closely matched empirical data, and further analyses revealed systematic effects of age and gambling frequency on forgetting and decision strategies. Discussion: Our findings underscore the fundamental role of forgetting in complex decision-making environments. By explicitly modeling information decay, the EEF framework offers novel insights into cognitive dynamics across the lifespan and behavioral contexts, and provides a parsimonious yet powerful tool for future computational and empirical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.