Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40538473›Full record

ReviewACS sustainable chemistry & engineering2025

Enabling Informed Decisions on Pyrolysis: A Key to Turn the Tide on Plastics Recycling.

Patritsia Maria Stathatou, Elisavet Anglou, Yuchen Chang, Jacob Sweet, Arvind Ganesan, Natechanok Yutthasaksunthorn, Erin V Phillips, Nikhita S Ragam, Omar Isaac Asensio, Sankar Nair and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Patritsia Maria StathatouSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Elisavet AnglouSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9651-2981
Yuchen ChangSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0997-4069
Jacob SweetSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8907-4302
Arvind GanesanSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9840-5097
Natechanok YutthasaksunthornSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Erin V PhillipsSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Nikhita S RagamSchool of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Omar Isaac AsensioSchool of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Sankar NairSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5339-470X
Fani BoukouvalaSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0584-1517
Carsten SieversSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5713-1875

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid expansion of the plastic industry has led to significant environmental challenges, prompting the exploration of alternative recycling methods. While mechanical recycling has limitations, chemical recycling, particularly pyrolysis, presents a promising solution. However, it faces contention regarding its environmental impacts and economic feasibility. In this perspective, we analyze both supporting and opposing viewpoints of plastic pyrolysis, highlighting the need for transparent, comprehensive, and measurement-informed life cycle assessments (LCAs) of pyrolysis systems to inform decisions. We also present a case study of literature-reported greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from pyrolysis-derived ultralow sulfur diesel (ULSD) in the United States, showing that depending on plant capacity and co-product allocation methods, emissions can range from 28% lower to 30% higher than fossil-derived ULSD. Similarly, when viewed as a waste management strategy, net GHG emissions from plastic pyrolysis can range from 220% lower to 60% higher than those from current U.S. plastic waste management practices, depending on system conditions. These findings underscore the variability of results and the need for currently missing, robust, and contextualized LCAs. Finally, we discuss regulatory and social challenges and opportunities for the wider adoption of chemical recycling, emphasizing the critical role of public support in realizing the potential of pyrolysis for a circular economy.

Indexed as

chemical recyclingcircularitylife cycle assessmentplastic wastepublic supportpyrolysisstakeholder engagement

Identifiers

PMID40538473
PMCPMC12175162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.