Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40538464›Full record

ArticleJOR spine2025

The Helical Compliance Vector: Utility for Quantifying Spinal Mechanics.

Matthew R MacEwen, Rebecca E Abbott, Victor H Barocas, Arin M Ellingson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JOR spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biomechanical differences between occipital plate and modified C1 lateral mass screw in the treatment of complex craniocervical malformations: a finite element analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew R MacEwenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA.
Rebecca E AbbottDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora Colorado USA.
Victor H BarocasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA.
Arin M EllingsonDivision of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6154-8035

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Multiscale Modeling of Facet CapsuleMechanobiologyU01AT010326 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BAROCAS, VICTOR H, WINKELSTEIN, BETH A · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
Generalized joint hypermobility and chronic neck pain: associations with dynamic cervical spine instabilityF32AR082276 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ABBOTT, REBECCA · 2023 to 2023
$39k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCCIH NIH HHS U01 AT010326NIAMS NIH HHS F32 AR082276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study introduces the helical compliance vector (HCV), a novel measuring parameter that quantifies the orientation and magnitude of joint compliance (inverse of stiffness) by integrating kinetic and kinematic data within the helical axis framework. The HCV provides high temporal and spatial resolution, enabling detailed analysis of compliance and stiffness throughout motion, surpassing the limitations of traditional static or end-range metrics, which often fail to capture transient variations in stiffness and multiplanar interactions that occur during movement. Methods: Eight cadaveric lumbar segments (L4-L5) were tested under pure moment loading (up to 7 Nm) in lateral bending, flexion/extension, axial rotation, and a multiplanar (Kemp's) test. Results: The findings revealed distinct moment-specific compliance trends, with the highest compliance during low-moment flexion and the lowest during axial rotation. The Kemp's test demonstrated the HCV's ability to capture complex coupled motions, combining lateral bending and axial rotation motion. Across all loading scenarios, compliance decreased significantly near the end range of motion, illustrating its evolution throughout motion. Conclusion: By simultaneously characterizing the magnitude and directionality of compliance, the HCV framework offers a comprehensive, high-resolution approach to understanding joint mechanics. This method establishes a foundation for investigating multiplanar joint behaviors and can be extended to in vivo applications using advanced imaging and musculoskeletal modeling technologies.

Indexed as

biomechanicscompliancehelical axeslumbar spinestiffness

Identifiers

PMID40538464
PMCPMC12178079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.