ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Scar characteristics of percutaneous Achilles tenotomy in Ponseti Technique-A cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clubfoot, a common birth defect, is treated with the Ponseti method. It involves an intensive phase of weekly casting and Achilles tenotomy as the last step in most of the cases. The tenotomy scar of percutaneous Achilles tenotomy may cause aesthetic concerns that could affect parental satisfaction or impede footwear use. This study aims to objectively evaluate the scar characteristics of percutaneous Achilles tenotomy during Ponseti treatment and parental perception of the same. Methods: This study enrolled children with idiopathic clubfoot treated by Ponseti protocol with percutaneous Achilles tenotomy before 1 year of age and on bracing protocol between 2 and 4 years. The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS 2.0) were used to assess scar quality. Complications such as hypertrophy, keloid formation, brace difficulty, footwear difficulty, and walking difficulties were noted. Results: The study evaluated 82 scars in 50 children (35 males, 15 females). At the final follow-up, most of the scars were close to the normal skin. The mean value of the VSS and overall opinion of the observer and parents regarding the scar was 3.0 ± 1.0, 1.2 ± 0.5 and 2.2 ± 2.1 respectively. All children were able to walk using normal shoes and actively take part in outdoor activities and no complications such as hypertrophic scar or keloid formation were seen. Conclusion: Percutaneous tenotomy causes minimal scarring and does not interfere with the general functioning of the child. The aesthetic characteristics of the scar are well-accepted by the parents. The use of percutaneous tenotomy should not be limited by the concern of a scar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.