Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40538434›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Visual gaze bias motion detection by split eyes in miniature whiteflies.

Tomer Urca, Fritz-Olaf Lehmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bioinspired Photodetectors: From Nature to Advanced Applications.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomer UrcaDepartment of Animal Physiology, Institute of Biosciences, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
Fritz-Olaf LehmannDepartment of Animal Physiology, Institute of Biosciences, University of Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision in miniature insects is constrained by an extremely small number of ommatidia and brain cells available for image processing. Here, we explore how one millimeter whiteflies cope with these limits during vision-mediated locomotion by linking micro-tomographical reconstructions of the eye to changes in visual gaze in maneuvering flight. The split eye design accommodates two flat arrays with 31 and 42 ommatidia at 53° mean angular spacing, which limits panoramic view. Low optical resolution with 14.4° interommatidial angle hampers object recognition and visual motion detection needed for body posture stability reflexes. During maneuvering, mean gaze direction of both eye sections differs in elevation and azimuth depending on yaw, pitch, and roll angles. Dorsal and ventral eye sections thus receive visual information from specific areas in the visual environment. Collectively, splitting the eye into separate ommatidia arrays potentially allows whiteflies to maintain elaborate vision-controlled flight behaviors even at reduced visual capacity.

Indexed as

Cognitive neuroscienceSensory neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID40538434
PMCPMC12177176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.