ArticleGlobal epidemiology2025
Artificial intelligence for advancing eye care in resource-poor settings: Assessing the predictive accuracy of an AI-model for diabetic retinopathy screening in India.
Article in Global epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: From diagnostic accuracy to clinical application.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- National implementation of a digital Parkinson's disease screening programme in Thailand: reach, adoption, and real-world performance of the CheckPD app.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Clinical Reformation in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Safeguarding the Ethical Centre of Medicine.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Review
- Detection and diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus images using agentic AI approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Timely identification and treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is critical in avoiding vision loss. DR screening is challenging, especially in resource-limited areas where trained ophthalmologists are scarce. AI solutions show promise in addressing this challenge. In this study, the performance metrics of an AI solution (MadhuNetrAI) developed in India was evaluated for referring and grading DR. Methods: MadhuNetrAI was developed de novo by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) and Wadhwani AI (WIAI). It was tested on 1078 fundus images (from AIIMS Delhi and an unannotated subset of publicly available EyePACS images) against two ophthalmologists and an adjudicator serving as independent gold-standard annotators, wherein the disease status of the patients remained unknown. Findings: MadhuNetrAI demonstrated high sensitivity (93·2 %; CI: 89·5 %-95·6 %) and specificity (95·3 %; CI: 93·7 %-96·6 %) in detecting referable DR (moderate, severe, proliferative DR). The area-under-the-curve for referring DR against the gold standard was 0·97 (CI: 0·95-0·99) indicating excellent diagnostic performance. The agreement in grading DR severity was high (kappa = 0·89, CI: 0·86-0·91). The model performed comparably in detecting DR too. Interpretation: MadhuNetrAI's ability to grade DR severity and identify referrable cases could bring DR patients to care much earlier. Further research and clinical trials are needed to ensure its reliability and generalizability across diverse populations and image qualities. Funding: MadhuNetrAI was developed by technical and programmatic teams at WIAI, with inputs and contributions by the clinical team at AIIMS, and funded by USAID. The authors have no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest to disclose.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.