Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40538413›Full record

ArticleThe International journal, advanced manufacturing technology2025

Shear dominated deformation with curved beaks in folding-shearing.

Rishabh Arora, Omer Music, Julian M Allwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal, advanced manufacturing technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rishabh AroraDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ UK.
Omer MusicDeepForm Ltd., Allia Future Business Centre, Cambridge, CB4 2HY UK.
Julian M AllwoodDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The deep drawing process in the automotive industry generates up to 45% material waste. To address this issue, the folding-shearing process was developed as a drop-in solution, enabling the formation of parts in pure shear with minimal thickness variation. This process involves folding a blank while collecting the excess material in a region called the 'beak', which is subsequently sheared in-plane using a single set of tools moving in one forming direction. This paper investigates the extent to which the curvature of the geometry of the beak influences the resulting thickness distribution. A combination of physical and numerical trials demonstrates that a beak design with a negative Gaussian curvature reduces the maximum thickening by 65%. This reduction in thickening helps minimise the forming loads and tool wear, thereby improving the overall robustness of the process. An analytical model is proposed to predict the resulting thickness distribution and demonstrates accuracy within a 12.5% deviation from experimental results. Finally, a design map is proposed to instantly identify the optimal beak design parameters without the need for extensive numerical or physical validations while ensuring a minimal thickness change.

Indexed as

Design optimizationFolding-ShearingSheet metal formingStampingTool geometry

Identifiers

PMID40538413
PMCPMC12174201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.