ArticleSleep and biological rhythms2025
Association between common mental disorders and sleep parameters measured by self-report and actigraphy in Brazilian female shift workers.
Article in Sleep and biological rhythms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the association between common mental disorders (CMD) and sleep parameters measured objectively through actigraphy, as well as using self-reported data, among female shift workers in southern Brazil. This cross-sectional study involved 450 female participants, with 278 undergoing actigraphy. CMD was assessed using a Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20), while self-reported sleep disturbance was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scale. Actigraphy was utilized to measure sleep quality over a consecutive 48-h period. The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using multinomial logistic regression. The prevalence of sleep disturbance was 9.7% (95% CI 7.2-12.9) according to the PSQI, while CMD prevalence was 47.3% (95% CI 42.6-52.1) in the entire sample. Sleep disturbance was significantly associated with positive CMD screening (OR = 20.03; 95% CI 7.22-55.54) as well as with night shift work (OR = 5.38; 95% CI 1.75-16.52). CMD did not exhibit a statistically significant association with objective sleep quality parameters measured using actigraphy. However, adjusted analysis of sleep efficiency revealed that women on the afternoon (OR = 3.09; 95% CI 1.53-6.25) or night shifts (OR = 3.43; 95% CI 1.60-7.35) had a higher prevalence of 10 or more awakenings during sleep compared to those working morning shifts. This study highlights the high prevalence of CMD among female shift workers. Furthermore, CMD demonstrated a statistically significant association with self-reported sleep disorders within this population group. However, this association was not observed when compared with objective data collected by actigraphy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.