ArticleSleep and biological rhythms2025
Risk warning model for predicting sleep disorders in healthcare workers on long-term shifts.
Article in Sleep and biological rhythms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term shift work significantly impacts the health of healthcare workers, with sleep disorders (SD) being a common and urgent concern. Traditional predictive models often perform poorly in identifying minority class samples-specifically healthcare workers experiencing SD-due to dataset imbalances. This study aimed to construct a risk warning model by introducing the synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) to improve the predictive accuracy for SD among healthcare workers engaged in long-term shift work, providing a scientific basis for early intervention. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the sleep conditions of 181 healthcare workers at CR&WISCO General Hospital, Wuhan University of Science and Technology. Participants were divided into two groups based on their sleep status: 70 individuals in group A (AG) with SD, and 111 individuals in group B (BG) without SD. The application of the SMOTE-based risk warning model was analyzed for predicting SD in healthcare workers under long-term shift work, and the model's performance was validated against two other models and three verification datasets. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of SD among healthcare workers under long-term shift work revealed that gender, age, occupation, education level, professional title, authorization strength, shift duration, work hours, anxiety, and depression were identified as independent influencing factors. The SMOTE warning model achieved a sensitivity of 83.22%, specificity of 78.67%, accuracy of 85.35%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 74.60%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 87.67%, significantly outperforming the original dataset, backpropagation (BP) model, and the random forest (RF) model ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41105-025-00583-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.