Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40538339›Full record

Observational studyWork (Reading, Mass.)2025

Exploring sense of coherence (SOC) in relation to working conditions for employees with hearing loss.

Sara Båsjö, Johanna Gustafsson, Sarah Granberg

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara BåsjöSchool of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0006-5146-7155
Johanna GustafssonSchool of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3023-3422
Sarah GranbergSchool of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2298-6806

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundPeople with hearing loss (HL) report several challenging situations in working life (WL). HL can negatively affect, e.g., the ability to communicate, creating barriers and difficulties in WL. However, there is a lack of studies that investigates salutary aspects in relation to working conditions for the target group. Sense of Coherence (SOC) is a salutary concept widely used when investigating aspects in WL but is less explored in relation to HL.ObjectiveTo explore the concept of Sense of Coherence (SOC) in relation to working conditions for employees with HL.MethodsAn observational study with a cross-sectional design including people with HL in working age using hearing aids (HAs) or cochlear implants (CIs). Comparisons were made between participants "in work" and participants on "HL-related sick leave".ResultsThe "in work" group reported a higher SOC compared to the "HL-related sick leave" group. The analysis showed significant differences between the two groups in all three dimensions of SOC with the "in work" group being better off in almost all investigated variables.ConclusionSOC is a valuable concept for investigating working conditions for employees with HL. The results indicate that to increase the possibility of salutary working conditions, it is necessary to focus on consequences of HL, such as the need for recovery, autonomy and support. Addressing these aspects increases employees' comprehension of and ability to manage the work situation and their sense of meaningfulness, which may act as a buffer against work-related stress and reduce the risk of sick leave.

Indexed as

EmploymentHearing LossSense of CoherenceWorkplaceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHearing AidsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesWorking Conditionshearing lossoccupational healthsalutogenesissense of coherenceworking conditionsworkplace

Identifiers

PMID40538339
PMCPMC12647388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.