Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40538231›Full record

SynthesisTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease

Efficacy and safety of ensifentrine in treatment of COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Bara M Hammadeh, Osama M Younis, Muaath I Alsufi, Muhammad Idrees, Ayham Mohammad Hussein, Abdullah Yousef Aldalati, Fares A Qtaishat, Banan Qatawneh, Al Bugazia, Raed A Hamed

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bara M HammadehFaculty of Medicine, Al-Balqa' Applied University, Salt 11185, Jordan.ORCID 0009-0002-1025-1068
Osama M YounisFaculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0009-0004-1027-554X
Muaath I AlsufiFaculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Muhammad IdreesFaculty of Medicine, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9516-8214
Ayham Mohammad HusseinFaculty of Medicine, Al-Balqa' Applied University, Salt, Jordan.
Abdullah Yousef AldalatiFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID 0009-0009-2260-0326
Fares A QtaishatFaculty of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0009-0005-6017-2861
Banan QatawnehFaculty of Medicine, Al-Balqa' Applied University, Salt, Jordan.
Al BugaziaDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Raed A HamedDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive lung disease marked by airway inflammation and obstruction. Ensifentrine is a novel inhaled PDE3 and PDE4 inhibitor with both bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory effects.

objectivesComprehensively review the available evidence on ensifentrine and its potential role in COPD management.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials. DATA SOURCES AND

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and Medline for clinical trials published between 2018 and August 2024 that evaluated the safety and efficacy of ensifentrine in patients with COPD. We assessed study quality using the RoB 2 tool and conducted the meta-analysis with the "meta" package in R (version 4.3.2), using the mean difference with a 95% confidence interval to evaluate changes in outcomes.

resultsFive studies met the predefined inclusion criteria with 2519 participants. At week 12, the pooled analysis indicated that forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV

conclusionIn conclusion, owing to its dual effects, ensifentrine has a significant impact on improving pulmonary function and quality of life with minimal side effects. Promising results are expected if implied by synergizing with other drugs, however, more studies are needed to study the long-term effect on disease progression.

trial registrationThe study protocol was published via PROSPERO: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (#CRD42024570799).

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsBronchodilator AgentsLungPhosphodiesterase 3 InhibitorsPhosphodiesterase 4 InhibitorsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationForced Expiratory VolumeHumansIsoquinolinesPyrimidinonesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBronchodilator AgentsensifentrineIsoquinolinesPhosphodiesterase 3 InhibitorsPhosphodiesterase 4 InhibitorsPyrimidinonesCOPDensifentrinePDE4TSA

Identifiers

PMID40538231
PMCPMC12181703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.