Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40538157›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025

A preliminary adaptation and validation of the genetic counseling outcome scale (GCOS-24) for use in Greece.

Marina Makri, Anthoula Palasidou, Despoina Moraitou, Thomas Tegos, Liana Fidani, Magdalini Tsolaki

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marina Makri1st Department of Neurology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-1262-0747
Anthoula Palasidou1st Department of Neurology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0009-0008-3588-6493
Despoina MoraitouLaboratory of Neurodegenerative Disease, Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation, (CIRI-AUTh), Balkan Center, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Thomas Tegos1st Department of Neurology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Liana FidaniDepartment of Medical Biology-Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Magdalini Tsolaki1st Department of Neurology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demand for genetic testing and counseling services continues to grow as there is a utility to guide diagnosis and treatment for a range of genetic conditions. Genetic counseling (GC) is a medical practice that provides information and counseling to patients and relatives at risk of recurrence of a genetic disease and helps them understand and adapt to the medical, psychological, and familial implications of the genetic information of the disease. Health professionals working in this field need reliable measurement tools to evaluate the results of their interventions, intending to ensure quality service improvements and planning successful disease management strategies. The Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) is a brief self-reported questionnaire of 24 questions administered to assess GC interventions and the outcomes of the use of these services in patients and caregivers of individuals with genetic diseases. It has been translated and validated in many languages, but not in the Greek language, despite the increased need for GC services in Greece. Thus, the questionnaire was translated into Modern Greek, and the reverse translation method was followed. 257 people participated in the research (63.6% women, 67.8% between 20 and 40 years, 45.9% University education of a high educational level). The construct validity of the questionnaire was examined through exploratory factor analysis and internal consistency through Cronbach's alpha. A significant difference in GCOS from the original scale is the fewer items-19 as opposed to 24. Greek GCOS is constructed of a two-factor structure and is a reliable tool (α = 0.79) for assessing patient empowerment in GC. With empowerment serving as an end measure, as it is focused on patient-centered care, this study adds to the international validation process of the GCOS-24 with the eventual objective of utilizing this instrument as a PROM to assess and enhance the services of GC in diverse clinical genetics settings.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingAdultFemaleGreeceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesempowermentGCOS‐24genetic counselingscale weightingtranslation and cultural adaptation

Identifiers

PMID40538157
PMCPMC12179581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.