Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40538149›Full record

ArticleThe clinical teacher2025

How to Develop and Deliver a Virtual Exchange Based on Collaborative Online International Learning Principles (COIL).

Jonathan Kennedy, Jessie Dubreuil, Danielle Thibodeau, Aaron Zachmeier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The clinical teacher, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan KennedyQueen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2621-6953
Jessie DubreuilUC Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.
Danielle ThibodeauKuehne Logistics University and University of East Anglia, Hamburg, Germany.
Aaron ZachmeierUC Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) is a pedagogical approach to virtual exchanges that emphasises experiential and collaborative learning activities. The key aim of COIL virtual exchanges is to encourage students to develop intercultural competence-that is, the ability to communicate and cooperate with people from different backgrounds. Intercultural competence is a particularly important skill for doctors and other health workers, who will spend much of their working lives interacting with patients and colleagues who have been shaped by different values, beliefs and experiences. Many nonmedical education studies demonstrate that COIL virtual exchanges have a positive impact on students' intercultural competence. Recently, a couple of studies have shown that this is also true for medical students. Despite this, COIL virtual exchanges are not widely utilised in medical education. This paper outlines some of the key steps clinical teachers must take when designing and delivering a virtual exchange based on COIL principles. It is grounded in the literature on COIL virtual exchanges, as well as our experience of designing, delivering and evaluating a COIL virtual exchange involving medical students in the United Kingdom and pre-med students in the United States. The paper provides practical guidance covering: finding an exchange partner; choosing a focus for your exchange; and designing an exchange that creates a space for students to work together and foster creativity, critical thinking and problem-solving abilities.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorCultural CompetencyEducation, DistanceEducation, MedicalInternational Educational ExchangeHumansStudents, MedicalUnited KingdomUnited Statescollaborative online international learningintercultural competencevirtual international exchanges

Identifiers

PMID40538149
PMCPMC12179576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.