ArticlePhysiological reports2025
The pristine unused pulmonary surfactant isolated from human amniotic fluid forms highly condensed interfacial films.
Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The pristine unused pulmonary surfactant isolated from human amniotic fluid forms highly condensed interfacial films.Physiological reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pulmonary surfactant is a lipid/protein complex that coats the alveolar air-liquid interface to minimize surface tension facilitating breathing mechanics. Native surfactant (NS) is typically obtained from lavages of animal lungs, where it has gone through structural alterations as a result of exposure to respiratory dynamics and highly oxidative environments. We have studied here the structure of interfacial films formed by human amniotic fluid surfactant (AFS), thought to maintain the structural and functional features of a fully operative still non-used surfactant, as it has not been subjected to breathing dynamics yet. The results show that AFS adsorbs better at the interface, to form films supporting higher compression rates, than NS upon spreading at comparable concentrations and amounts. Films formed by AFS exhibit condensed regions excluding fluorescently labeled lipids from the mere adsorption, while films formed by NS only showed segregation of ordered-like domains once subjected to compression-expansion dynamics. Finally, AFS films were consistent with the presence of solid-like highly ordered phases, while NS consisted under comparable conditions of a coexistence of liquid-disordered/liquid-ordered fluid phases. This indicates that operative surfactant films formed by freshly secreted surfactant could be much more condensed than previously supposed, likely providing maximal stability under breathing mechanics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.