ArticleKorean journal of anesthesiology2025
Effects of sugammadex and rocuronium on electro-mechanical activity of cardiac myocytes.
Article in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSugammadex reverses the effects of steroidal neuromuscular-blocking agents, such as rocuronium, by encapsulating these agents. Its cardiovascular adverse effects include QTc prolongation, hypotension, bradycardia, atrioventricular block, atrial fibrillation, and asystole. Additionally, rocuronium has cardiac side effects, such as bradycardia, hypotension, cardiac arrest, circulatory collapse, and ventricular fibrillation. Herein, we investigated the effects of sugammadex, rocuronium, and combined rocuronium + sugammadex on cardiac electrophysiological parameters.
methodsIn vitro experiments were performed using ventricular myocytes obtained from male Wistar rats. Myocyte contraction and relaxation responses were recorded along with action potential (AP), and L-type calcium (ICaL) and potassium channel currents (Ito, Iss, and IK1).
resultsSugammadex caused dose-dependent decreases in myocyte contraction and relaxation responses. Rocuronium had no effect in this respect, whereas its co-administration with sugammadex led to decreased contraction responses. Sugammadex prolonged the AP repolarization phase, whereas rocuronium prolonged all AP phases. Co-administration of sugammadex and rocuronium did not significantly affect AP parameters. Sugammadex suppressed the peak ICaL value, while rocuronium caused an even greater decrease. Co-administration of these drugs further decreased the current-voltage characteristics of the ICaL. However, no significant effects were observed on the potassium currents.
conclusionsSeparate or combined administration of sugammadex and rocuronium had various effects on myocyte contractility, AP, and ICaL, which could cause significant changes leading to adverse cardiac events. Further experimental and clinical studies are required to understand the clinical consequences of the modulatory effects of these drugs on cardiac electrophysiological parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.