ArticleCladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society2025
Establishing new grid-size-dependent attributes to rank areas of endemism for conservation priorities.
Article in Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Delineating Areas of Endemism (AEs) is crucial for identifying priority areas for biodiversity conservation in a spatial planning framework. Endemicity Analysis in the NDM/VNDM software is one of the primary methodologies for its delineation. Larger grid sizes have been employed to yield higher endemicity scores for AEs, recovering more endemic species and enhancing their conservation appeal. Compiling a robust geographic distribution dataset for 399 freshwater fish species from Southern Brazil, we identified AEs by conducting endemicity analyses with three different grid sizes. We also developed a spatial conservation Priority Index incorporating three grid-size-dependent attributes. We identified 153 AEs, each varying in endemicity scores, species richness, and threatened species. These variations were influenced by the analysed grid size and spatial overlap with specific freshwater ecoregions. The recovered AEs show freshwater fish distribution patterns corroborating significant vicariance events and faunal exchanges between river basins in distinct bordering ecoregions. We found an almost 50% reduction in spatial area when ranking Endemicity and Priority Index scores. This finding demonstrates the effectiveness of the Priority Index in highlighting similar sets of endemic, sympatric, and threatened species within smaller areas. This approach can effectively reconcile attributes easily extracted from the NDM/VNDM program when prioritizing spatial conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.