Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40538042›Full record

SynthesisEpidemiology and infection2025

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 shedding in exhaled material: a systematic review.

A M Hasanthi Abeykoon, Madeleine Wilson, Kanta Subbarao, Nicholas Geard, Cameron Zachreson, Sheena Geraldine Sullivan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Epidemiology and infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A M Hasanthi AbeykoonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Melbourne Medical School, https://ror.org/01ej9dk98University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6899-9573
Madeleine WilsonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Melbourne Medical School, https://ror.org/01ej9dk98University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kanta SubbaraoWHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, Royal Melbourne Hospital, https://ror.org/01ej9dk98Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Nicholas GeardSchool of Computing and Information Systems, https://ror.org/01ej9dk98The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0069-2281
Cameron ZachresonSchool of Computing and Information Systems, https://ror.org/01ej9dk98The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0578-4049
Sheena Geraldine SullivanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Melbourne Medical School, https://ror.org/01ej9dk98University of Melbourne, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review synthesized evidence on the viral load of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) shedding in exhaled material to understand how the exhaled SARS-CoV-2 viral load of infected individuals varies with days since exposure. Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched using a combination of search terms to identify articles that tested exhaled material from SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. Records were systematically screened and assessed for eligibility, following which reference lists of eligible articles were hand-searched to identify further relevant studies. Data extraction and quality assessment of individual studies were conducted prior to synthesizing the evidence. Forty-five articles that sampled exhaled breath, exhaled breath condensate, face masks, and cough samples were reviewed. The variation in the SARS-CoV-2 viral load in these materials was considerable with the detection of viral RNA shed during breathing as far as 43 days after symptom onset. The replication-competent virus was present in all four sample types, with the majority isolated during the first week of symptoms onset. Variations in the sample types and testing protocols precluded meta-analysis. High heterogeneity in exhaled SARS-CoV-2 viral load is likely due to host and viral factors as well as variations in sampling and diagnostic methodologies. Evidence on SARS-CoV-2 shedding in exhaled material is scarce and more controlled fundamental studies are needed to assess this important route of viral shedding.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Virus SheddingBreath TestsExhalationHumansRNA, ViralViral LoadRNA, ViralCOVID-193Exhaled breathReplication competentSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2Systematic review

Identifiers

PMID40538042
PMCPMC12247008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.