ArticleDisaster medicine and public health preparedness2025
Development of Evidence-based Guidelines on Assessment and Management of Internal Contamination with Transuranic Actinides.
Article in Disaster medicine and public health preparedness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiomitigators: Breakthroughs in Post-Radiation Recovery.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo describe the process of the development of evidence-based guidelines on the assessment and clinical management of internal contamination with transuranic actinides (specifically plutonium, americium, and curium) in incidents where workers, emergency responders, and the public might uptake these radionuclides internally through inhalation, ingestion, or wound contamination.
methodsThe World Health Organization (WHO) set up a guidelines development group (GDG) that follows the protocol required for producing evidence-based recommendations as described elsewhere. The GRADE® approach was applied throughout the process, including developing research questions formulation, prioritization and rating the importance for the outcomes, assessing the certainty of the evidence, considering contextual factors, and making recommendations.
resultsThrough 3 working group meetings held 2023-2024, the GDG defined and rated patient-important health outcomes, and evidence gathered through systematic reviews and its certainty rating, working towards formulating the recommendations using an evidence-to-recommendation (EtR) framework.
conclusionsThe WHO protocol for developing health care management guidelines uses a transparent and robust evidence-based GRADE® approach. Once published, these guidelines will provide the first evidence-based recommendations for assessment and clinical management of internal contamination with transuranic actinides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.