ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Machine Learning-Driven Discovery of TRIM Genes as Diagnostic Biomarkers for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive lung disease with limited effective treatments and significant challenges in early diagnosis. Identifying reliable biomarkers is crucial for improving diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed TRIM family gene expression in IPF patients and healthy controls using GSE93606, GSE33566, and GSE38958 datasets. Consensus clustering and WGCNA identified IPF subtypes and hub genes. Machine learning models (RF, GLM, SVM, XGB) were built to identify key disease genes. A nomogram for clinical prediction was developed and validated. Peripheral blood samples from IPF patients and healthy controls were used to validate gene expression via qPCR. RESULTS TRIM family genes were significantly differentially expressed between IPF patients and healthy controls. Two distinct IPF subtypes (C1 and C2) were identified, each exhibiting unique biological functions and signaling pathways. The RF model outperformed other machine learning models, identifying TNIK, NCL, ROPN1L, MTR, and HNRNPH1 as key disease-characteristic genes. The nomogram demonstrated good predictive accuracy (AUC: 0.741, 95% CI: 0.556-0.897). qPCR validation confirmed increased expression of 4 genes in IPF patients, except for ROPN1L, which showed decreased expression. CONCLUSIONS This study identifies and validates TRIM family genes as potential biomarkers for IPF diagnosis using clinical samples. The findings support the integration of these biomarkers into diagnostic workflows, potentially enhancing early diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies for IPF patients. Further research is needed to explore the prognostic value and underlying mechanisms of these genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.