Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40537967›Full record

ArticleAnatomical sciences education2025

A scoping review of teaching approaches and learning objectives for anatomical variation in gross anatomy courses across degree programs.

Kayla Vieno-Corbett, Nicole Campbell, Angela Pecyna, Kem A Rogers

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kayla Vieno-CorbettDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8242-2749
Nicole CampbellDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Angela PecynaDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Kem A RogersDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship in Science and Technology Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gross anatomy is often taught and assessed based on a "standard" view of the human body, limiting students' exposure to normal variation, creating a potential curricular gap in the training of future anatomists and health care professionals. This scoping review explores learning objectives and teaching approaches associated with anatomical variation in undergraduate, graduate, and professional courses. Six primary databases and gray literature sources were searched. Records that described either implicit or explicit approaches for teaching anatomical variation in gross anatomy courses at the undergraduate, graduate, or professional level were included. Source selection, data extraction, and analysis followed the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Human donor dissection was the most common approach for implicitly teaching anatomical variation (35.7%, 56/157). Only a few records (25.5%, 40/157) reported examples of explicit teaching approaches, such as student recordings of variation, exposure to multiple donors, and independent research. Reported learning objectives primarily involved awareness, appreciation, and knowledge of anatomical variation. Other learning objectives included the recognition of human diversity, professionalism, collaboration, knowledge through anatomical variation, and navigating anatomical variation. Objectives were mapped to Bloom's Taxonomy, showing that explicit approaches were associated with higher-order learning. This review highlights a gap in the literature regarding the explicit teaching of anatomical variation despite the benefits of explicit approaches for enabling higher-order levels of learning across multiple domains. Recognizing anatomical variation is essential for health care professionals, and this review suggests a need for intentional instructional strategies to better support students in navigating anatomical diversity in educational and clinical contexts.

Indexed as

Anatomic VariationAnatomyEducation, Medical, UndergraduateLearningTeachingCurriculumDissectionHumansanatomical variationeducational resourcesequity, diversity, inclusion, and decolonizationgross anatomy educationlearning objectivespedagogyscoping reviewteaching methods

Identifiers

PMID40537967
PMCPMC12413476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.