ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2025
Comprehensive genomic profiling of Taiwanese triple-negative breast cancer with a large targeted sequencing panel.
Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer patients: beyond endocrine therapy.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2026Article
- Management of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer patients: First-line therapy.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2025Article
- Comprehensive genomic profiling of Taiwanese triple-negative breast cancer samples with medium- and large-sized sequencing panels: A comparative study implicating treatment allocations.Biomedical reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women, particularly those with the triple-negative (TN) phenotype. Although novel therapeutic options are emerging, most are biomarker-driven. This study used comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) via targeted sequencing to identify actionable alterations in a TN subcohort of the VGH-TAYLOR study.
methodsThe study included patients with either early-stage (defined by first-line surgery or neoadjuvant therapy) or late-stage (defined by relapse or de novo metastatic disease) breast cancer. CGP was performed using the Illumina TruSight Oncology 500 assay. The level of actionability was assessed using the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Scale of Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) criteria, with additional annotations provided by the PierianDx software and OncoKB database.
resultsCGP was successfully performed on 104 TN breast cancer samples. The most common actionable genes (occurring in >10% of cases) were PIK3CA (38%), BRCA2 (25%), PTEN (13%), BRCA1 (13%), ERBB2 (12%), and ERBB3 (11%). After applying a stringent per-variant filter, these frequencies were reduced to 22%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 4%, and 1% for PIK3CA , PTEN , BRCA2 , BRCA1 , AKT1 , and PALB2 , respectively. Based on the standard cut-off of 10 mutations/megabase, 24 samples were classified as tumor mutation burden (TMB)-high, whereas 80 were TMB-low. The proportion of TMB-high cases was lower among the early-stage patients compared to the late-stage patients (19% vs 36%; p < 0.05).
conclusionThis study demonstrates the clinical feasibility and utility of large-scale CGP, enabling the investigation of a broad range of genes and multi-gene signatures, such as TMB and microsatellite instability (MSI). The identification of actionable biomarkers offers the potential to expand therapeutic opportunities for TN breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.