Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40537850›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025

Video livestreaming in emergency trauma dispatch: an observational study of technological integration with clinical decision-making in prehospital enhanced care services.

Scott Munro, Lucie Ollis, Carin Magnusson, Jill Maben, Cath Taylor

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Managing apnoea in trauma victims: the potential for dispatcher-assisted airway handling - a narrative review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Scott MunroSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Lucie OllisSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Carin MagnussonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Jill MabenSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Cath TaylorSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK. cath.taylor@surrey.ac.uk.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR130811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency Medical Services (EMS) play a critical role as the initial point of contact for patients with trauma injuries, where making timely and accurate dispatch decisions is crucial for determining the speed and effectiveness of the response. Assessing injury severity and the appropriate EMS resources needed based on audio medical emergency number calls (e.g. 999/911/112) alone presents challenges. The prevalence of smartphones among the UK population offers a unique opportunity by enabling callers to send live video feeds to Emergency Operations Centres. This study explores the use of video livestreaming in emergency dispatch of prehospital enhanced care teams to determine how and why it impacts decision-making and situational awareness during trauma incidents and whether this varies by patient/caller, incident or dispatcher characteristics.

methodsA multimethod qualitative observational study was undertaken comprising 200 h of non-participant ethnographic observation of the use of video livestreaming in routine practice, and 14 semi-structured interviews with staff within two critical care services in London, UK who used the technology. Data collection and analysis were underpinned by naturalistic decision-making models that emphasise the role of situational awareness. Data were analysed and triangulated using the framework method.

findingsWe identified three phases in the decision-making process for use of video livestreaming in emergency dispatch: (i) Evaluation and Determination, (ii) Integration and Observation, and (iii) Resolution and Response. Phase 1 addresses why video livestreaming is used and the patient/caller, incident and dispatcher characteristics and identifying primary drivers and barriers. Phase 2 explores how livestreaming impacts situational awareness, focusing on visual cues such as clinical indicators, mechanisms of injury, and environmental factors. Phase 3 examines the impact on dispatch decision-making and immediate care advice. An overarching theme emphasises the role of dispatchers' clinical experience and expertise in using video livestreaming effectively.

conclusionsVideo livestreaming has the potential to impact situational awareness and decision-making in emergency dispatch, as reported by participants and observed during the study, particularly in response to complex and ambiguous trauma scenarios. The technology's effectiveness depends on dispatcher expertise, caller characteristics, and incident complexity. Further research is needed to evaluate its use across different EMS contexts.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingEmergency Medical DispatchEmergency Medical ServicesVideo RecordingWounds and InjuriesFemaleHumansLondonMaleQualitative ResearchDecision-makingEmergency medical servicesEthnographyInterviewPrehospitalQualitative researchSituational awarenessSmartphoneTraumaVideo

Identifiers

PMID40537850
PMCPMC12177982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.