Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40537846›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2025

Epigenetic editing and epi-drugs: a combination strategy to simultaneously target KDM4 as a novel anticancer approach.

Federica Sarno, Jim J Jacob, Roos E Eilers, Angela Nebbioso, Lucia Altucci, Marianne G Rots

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Epigenetic editing: from concept to clinic.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Federica SarnoEpigenetic Editing Research Group, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jim J JacobEpigenetic Editing Research Group, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Roos E EilersEpigenetic Editing Research Group, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Angela NebbiosoDipartimento Di Medicina Di Precisione, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Lucia AltucciDipartimento Di Medicina Di Precisione, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Marianne G RotsEpigenetic Editing Research Group, Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.g.rots@umcg.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

KDM4-A/B/C, preferentially demethylating di- and tri-methylated lysine 9 on histone H3, are overexpressed in cancers and considered interesting therapeutic targets. Consequently, KDM4 inhibitors have been developed to block their enzymatic activity. However, the potential lack of specificity of such small molecules (epi-drugs) may contribute to dose-limiting toxicities. In the pursuit of more specific interventions, epigenetic editing (epi-editing) has emerged as a powerful tool to modulate gene expression by modifying the epigenetic profile of specific genomic locations. The recently developed CRISPRoff (dCas9 fused to DNMT3A/3L and KRAB), guided by sgRNAs, is successfully used for gene repression by introducing methylation of DNA and (indirectly) of histones at the targeted genomic region. We propose that combining epi-editing (here to prevent the expression of KDM4) with epi-drugs (to inhibit the KDM4 protein activity) may represent a novel path for synergistic anticancer effects through simultaneous inhibition of gene expression and protein activity. Upon validating the downregulation of KDM4A in HEK293T cells through epi-editing, we demonstrated its repression in colon, breast and hepatocellular carcinomas which was effective in preventing (breast, MCF7) or inhibiting (colon, HCT116) cancer cell growth. Anticancer effect was also confirmed for these cell lines using the KDM4 inhibitor QC6352. In parallel, our studies demonstrate a previously unnoticed increase in the expression of KDM4-A/B/C genes following the inhibition of protein activity using the pan-KDM4 inhibitors QC6352 and JIB-04. Importantly, this induction of gene expression was fully prevented or even further inhibited by epi-editing. Then, we assessed the efficacy of our dual-targeted silencing approach in cancer cells and demonstrated that the inhibition in cancer cell growth by epi-drug or epigenetic editing could be further improved by combining the treatments. Building upon these findings, we introduce a novel, potentially synergistic, therapeutic strategy that combines epi-drug administration with epi-editing. This innovative approach aims to reduce drug toxicity and the potential development of resistance by preventing drug-induced upregulation of target enzyme expression, thereby further increasing anticancer effects.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsEpigenesis, GeneticGene EditingJumonji Domain-Containing Histone DemethylasesNeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA MethylationEpigenome EditingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansAntineoplastic AgentsJumonji Domain-Containing Histone DemethylasesKDM4A protein, humanCRISPR/dCas9Epi-drugsEpigenetic editingJIB-04KDM4QC6352

Identifiers

PMID40537846
PMCPMC12177974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.