Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Effects of manual perineal protection and pushing techniques used in the second stage of labor on perineal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial of combinations of strategies.
Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04823598 (Comparing Spontaneous Versus Interventionist Approaches), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparing Spontaneous Versus Interventionist Approaches: A Randomized Controlled Study on the Impact of Manual Perineal Protection and Pushing Techniques on Perineal Outcomes in Nulliparous Women
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical predictors of postpartum vaginal and vulvar hematomas and the need for surgical treatment.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManual perineal protection and pushing techniques can impact the incidence of perineal trauma. Limited data exist on the impact of combinations of management strategies employed during the second stage of labor on perineal outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the combined impact of interventional and relatively more spontaneous techniques employed during the second stage of labor on perineal outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis randomized controlled study was carried out in the maternity clinic of a state hospital. Low-risk, term nulliparous women with vertex presentation upon admission to the delivery unit were included in the study. The participants in the study were randomly assigned to either the hands-on perineal protection and directed pushing group or the hands-poised perineal protection and coached pushing group at the onset of the second stage of labor. The frequencies of episiotomy and perineal injury were the primary outcomes of the study. The secondary outcomes included maternal satisfaction, breastfeeding, Apgar scores, perineal muscle function and perineal pain scores, and the amount of postpartum hemorrhage.
resultsThe frequency of episiotomy was significantly lower in the hands-poised-undirected pushing group than in the hands-on-coached pushing group (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44-0.98, P = 0.04). The frequency of first-degree perineal injury was significantly greater in the hands-poised - undirected pushing group than in the hands-on-directed pushing group (RR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.06-3.90, P = 0.02). The frequencies of second-degree and higher perineal injuries were similar between the groups. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of secondary outcomes.
conclusionsSecond-stage management strategies with fewer interventions can be used to reduce the frequency of episiotomy. Both hands-on directed pushing and hands-poised undirected pushing combinations for second-stage management exhibit similar frequencies of intact perineum. TRIAL AND PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials; ID: NCT04823598; Date: 25.03.2021; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04823598 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.