ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
Fostering the growth and development of the female rural generalist workforce: a mixed methods study.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOver the last thirty years the demographics in medicine have changed with more female doctors graduating from medical schools. At the same time we are experiencing a rural health workforce shortage and a key issue is encouraging female doctors to take up rural careers. This study explores the training and work experiences of female doctors emerging from a general practice (GP) training pathway which promoted developing both primary care and additional skills to serve rural communities (Rural Generalist- RG). It further seeks to contrast perspectives of the barriers and enablers to RG training and careers between emerging and mature cohorts of RG self-identifying females.
methodsA sequential mixed method framework was undertaken. Firstly, a survey was sent to all females who had completed their GP fellowship training with a regional training provider focused on promoting RG training and career development between 2016 and 2022 (cohort one). This was followed by semi-structured interviews with this cohort and females self-identifying as RGs who were in mature careers (cohort two).
resultsResults showed that the majority of females were working less than full time. 71% of females who recently completed training (cohort one) were working in large population centres and 39% were working in rural and remote areas with the majority intending to stay in their current role. Most indicated that they were happy with the salaried parts of their role. For those working rurally (beyond large population centres) the hours of work were unpredictable. In interviews, cohort one reflected experiences of a more female-friendly work environment than those in cohort two (mature careers). However, both faced similar issues around children, family, partners and workload related to RG work and both sought mentors for practical and emotional support.
conclusionsThis study shows the need to consider the whole person within recruitment processes and provide both personal and professional support. In addition, flexibility for part time training and less than full time work needs to be offered and become more accepted within the medical community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.