SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Outcomes of heart surgery in neonates with trisomy 13 and 18: a systematic review with metanalysis.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of cardiac surgery in neonates with trisomy 13 (T13) or trisomy 18 (T18) compared to those managed with palliative care. A literature search was conducted in PubMed® and EMBASE®, following PRISMA guidelines, and included five retrospective cohort studies (1627 patients). Outcomes analyzed included in-hospital mortality, survival at 12 months, length of stay (LOS), hospital discharge rates, and the need for mechanical ventilation. The meta-analysis showed that cardiac surgery significantly reduced the odds of in-hospital mortality (OR 0.12, CI 95% 0.03-0.42, p < 0.01), increased survival at 12 months (OR 19.77, CI 95% 5.12-76.36, p < 0.01), and improved discharge rates (OR 12.53, CI 95% 3.63-43.22, p < 0.01). However, limited data were available on quality of life and mechanical ventilation duration. Conclusion: Despite the positive impact of cardiac surgery on survival and discharge rates, the evidence remains low quality, as the included studies were primarily retrospective cohorts with moderate risk of bias. The findings highlight the importance of involving families in the decision-making process, given their differing perspectives on quality of life. Further high-quality studies, such as randomized controlled trials, are needed to provide stronger evidence on this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40537699What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.