Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40537606›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2025

Two Decades of Gender Differences in Pornography Research Topics.

Jingyuan Yu, Aliya Andrich, Max Schindler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jingyuan Yu *Department of Economic Sciences and Media, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ehrenbergstraße 29, 98693, Ilmenau, Germany. jingyuan.yu@tu-ilmenau.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9400-4859
Aliya Andrich *Department of Economic Sciences and Media, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ehrenbergstraße 29, 98693, Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9918-7535
Max SchindlerDepartment of Economic Sciences and Media, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ehrenbergstraße 29, 98693, Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1209-1777

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This exploratory study investigates the potential gender differences in research priorities, driven by factors such as established sexual stigma and traditional gender norms surrounding pornography. Using temporal and thematic analyses, we identify and examine research topics of 6,145 pornography studies published between 2001 and 2024. Our findings suggest that the lead author's gender may influence topic selection, with women exploring topics that have historically been underrepresented or overlooked. Furthermore, female-led publications have engaged with internet and web-related research earlier and more prominently. Additionally, our analyses outline the evolution of male- and female-led publication patterns in the field, highlighting a trend toward more balanced representation. This study aims to serve as a foundational basis for future research, encouraging more thorough investigations into gender disparities and their underlying causes within this domain. We also highlight the importance of longitudinal research to uncover potential gender disparities over time.

Indexed as

EroticaResearchFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsSexual BehaviorSocial StigmaBibliometricsGender differencesLongitudinal analysisPornographyThematic mapping

Identifiers

PMID40537606
PMCPMC12283780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.