ReviewEye (London, England)2025
Comparative cataract-lens opacification across species.
Review in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global challenges for lens and cataract research.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Around 12 million people globally are estimated to be blind with age-related cataract and numerous studies have sought to evaluate the causes of this lens opacification, many of these complicated by the difficulty of determining the impacts of varying aetiological factors from daylight through diet, diabetes and many more. While various experimental investigations on laboratory animals have sought to unpick these influences on lens transparency to date none has sought to evaluate age-related cataract across different animal species kept as companion animals. Here we look at a number of studies on companion dogs, cats and horses to determine the effects of daylight, diet, diabetes, dehydration, drugs, genetics (DNA to continue the D alliteration) and trauma (Damage again as a final D).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.