Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40537550›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025

Evaluation of fused deposition modeling (FDM)-printed devices for microfluidic-based cell culture studies.

Samuel Azibere, Michael Borovik, Andrew F Hall, Scott A Sell, R Scott Martin

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel AzibereDepartment of Chemistry, Saint Louis University, 3501 Laclede Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63103, USA.
Michael BorovikDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, USA.
Andrew F HallDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, USA.
Scott A SellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, USA.
R Scott MartinDepartment of Chemistry, Saint Louis University, 3501 Laclede Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63103, USA. scott.martin@slu.edu.

Funding

From single molecule to microfluidic 3D tissue platforms: novel multiscale tools to investigate hyper-stimulated immune cells in the circulationR01NS105888 · NINDS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Lane A. Baker, ROBERT Scott MARTIN · 2018 to 2026
$4.0M
NINDS NIH HHS 2R01NS105888-06A1NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we undertook an in-depth investigation of the parameters that can be optimized to create FDM-based devices (both static and fluidic) that are leak-free and can be used for cell culture. Two different types of FDM printers (Stratasys Fortus 250mc and Bambu Lab P1S/X1-carbon) were utilized and devices were printed with a polystyrene filament, since this polymer is commonly used to make cell culture flasks. Stratasys-printed devices were made leak-free by increasing the negative "air gap" values to offset the toolpath, which significantly minimized voids between layers. Bambu Lab-based devices exhibited no leakage when printed with the ironing variable enabled. These parameters were optimized based on the design (static vs. fluidic), and the final devices were able to withstand leakage when subjected to flow experiments. It was found that these devices led to the successful culture of bovine pulmonary artery endothelial cells and Madin-Darby canine kidney cells, and a comparison was made to culturing these cells on a PolyJet-based device (printed with VeroClear material). NMR analysis was employed to determine if any potential leachates of polystyrene resulted after printing of the devices. Finally, fiber scaffolds were integrated into devices to mimic extracellular matrix (ECM) and to demonstrate the ability to perform cell culture under flow conditions in such devices. It is clear that with the developed settings, robust fluidic devices for cell culture can be created and used for the successful culture of endothelial and epithelial cells.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesPrinting, Three-DimensionalAnimalsCattleDogsEndothelial CellsEquipment DesignMadin Darby Canine Kidney CellsPolystyrenesPolystyrenes3D printingBioanalytical methodsCell systems/single cell analysisMicrofluidics/microfabrication

Identifiers

PMID40537550
PMCPMC12231178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.