ReviewNature chemical biology2025
Click biology highlights the opportunities from reliable biological reactions.
Review in Nature chemical biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing the Versatility of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Through Strategic Biomolecular Functionalization.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Review
- Tangled Tail of Mechanically Interlocked Peptides.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Review
- Catcher Domains as Multifunctional Fusion Modules for Soluble Expression, Covalent Coupling, and Spatial Organization of Recombinant Proteins.Small science · 2026Article
- Generating Ultra-Fast Protein trans-Splicing of a Cysteine-Less and Semisynthetic Split Intein for Chemical Protein Labeling.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Article
- Protein engineering: status report.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2026Review
- Three-Segment Protein Labeling Using a Highly Efficient and Cysteine-Less Split Intein Identified with Computational Prediction of Aggregation Properties.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Click chemistry is a powerful concept that refers to a set of covalent bond-forming reactions with highly favorable properties. In this Perspective, I outline the analogous concept of click biology as a set of reactions derived from the regular building blocks of living cells, rapidly forming covalent bonds to specific partners under cell-friendly conditions. Click biology using protein components employs canonical amino acids and may react close to the diffusion limit, with selectivity in living cells amid thousands of components generated from the same building blocks. I discuss how the criteria for click chemistry can be applied or modified to fit the extra constraints of click biology and achieve favorable characteristics for biological research. Existing reactions that may be described as click biology include split intein reconstitution, spontaneous isopeptide bond formation by SpyTag and SpyCatcher and suicide enzyme reaction with small-molecule ligands (HaloTag and SNAP-tag). I also describe how click biology has created new possibilities in fields including molecular imaging, mechanobiology, vaccines and engineering cellular intelligence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40537536What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.