ReviewInternational journal of oral science2025
Expert consensus on peri-implant keratinized mucosa augmentation at second-stage surgery.
Review in International journal of oral science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical outcomes of free gingival graft, xenogeneic collagen matrix, and acellular dermal matrix for peri-implant keratinized mucosa augmentation: a randomized controlled trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Trial
- Determinants of keratinized mucosa dimensional changes after apically positioned flap surgery around dental implants.Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2026Article
- Dental implant rehabilitation after jaw tumor resection: a mini-review of protocols and quality of life across treatment modalities.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Nano-Engineered Titanium Implants Loaded With Gingival Fibroblasts-Derived Microvesicles Enhance Early Osseointegration And Soft Tissue Attachment In Vivo.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- The effect of the injectable platelet-rich fibrin on peri-implant soft tissue phenotype: a preliminary, prospective, 12-month follow-up clinical study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Peri-Implantitis-An Overview of Treatment Options and a New Approach to the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis Using a Magnesium Membrane in Three Case Reports.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Evaluation of soft tissue outcomes following keratinized tissue augmentation around dental implants using free gingival graft and xenogenic collagen matrix: A randomized clinical study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Peri-Implant Soft-Tissue Augmentation Using Xenogeneic Collagen MatricesJournal of oral & maxillofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peri-implant keratinized mucosa (PIKM) augmentation refers to surgical procedures aimed at increasing the width of PIKM. Consensus reports emphasize the necessity of maintaining a minimum width of PIKM to ensure long-term peri-implant health. Currently, several surgical techniques have been validated for their effectiveness in increasing PIKM. However, the selection and application of PIKM augmentation methods may present challenges for dental practitioners due to heterogeneity in surgical techniques, variations in clinical scenarios, and anatomical differences. Therefore, clear guidelines and considerations for PIKM augmentation are needed. This expert consensus focuses on the commonly employed surgical techniques for PIKM augmentation and the factors influencing their selection at second-stage surgery. It aims to establish a standardized framework for assessing, planning, and executing PIKM augmentation procedures, with the goal of offering evidence-based guidance to enhance the predictability and success of PIKM augmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.