ArticleWater environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation2025
Good Ethical and Laboratory Practices for Wastewater Surveillance.
Article in Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Good Ethical and Laboratory Practices for Wastewater Surveillance.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wastewater Surveillance (WBS) is an approach for disease surveillance involving the screening of wastewater for RNA/DNA originating from infectious agents. In recent years, WBS has expanded to include analytes from pharmaceuticals (such as SSRI) or illicit drugs, referred to as "High-risk Substances" (HRS). The University of Maryland enacted in partnership with a local county public health department and water utility, a surveillance program to assess wastewater twice weekly for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 and other viral targets. WBS can provide rapid data showing where the location of clustered outbreaks may be occurring (specifically. The county public health department also requested that screening of high-risk substances (fentanyl, ketamine, Narcan, heroine, etc.) to be included in WBS, thus expanding the purview of the initial surveillance project focusing solely biological agents. A concern for any surveillance program is adhering to ethical standards, regulations, and protocols. In WBS, there is no single standardized "list of rules" to guide researchers in determining risk of privacy or community stigmatization. In an effort to counter the variation in WBS as it pertains to ethical standards, we propose utilizing an ethical scoring framework tailored for WBS. This framework includes a scoresheet that can assist scientists determine the privacy and ethical risks associated with their study by introducing a quantifiable process to assess ethical compliance. Furthermore, we include a flow map outlining standard laboratory practices under the lens of how each step assists in maintaining sample fidelity, thus increasing the robustness and reliability of the data generated. SUMMARY: It is important to balance ethical standards, public health and research strategies. Application of the tools listed in this document will ensure this balance. Application of the developed ethical guidelines (Score sheet) is a practical approach. It is important to integrate vigorous data management practices. Utilization of a robust and holistic structure of the wastewater surveillance program will ensure successful outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.