Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40537440›Full record

ArticleWater environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation2025

Good Ethical and Laboratory Practices for Wastewater Surveillance.

Rachel Hamant, Yuzhu Mao, Chunfu Liu, Alba Torrents, Birthe Kjellerup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Good Ethical and Laboratory Practices for Wastewater Surveillance.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel HamantDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Yuzhu MaoDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Chunfu LiuDepartment of Health Human Services, Montgomery County, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Alba TorrentsDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Birthe KjellerupDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5069-7641

Funding

Montgomery County Department of Health and Human Services [ID940EDE]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wastewater Surveillance (WBS) is an approach for disease surveillance involving the screening of wastewater for RNA/DNA originating from infectious agents. In recent years, WBS has expanded to include analytes from pharmaceuticals (such as SSRI) or illicit drugs, referred to as "High-risk Substances" (HRS). The University of Maryland enacted in partnership with a local county public health department and water utility, a surveillance program to assess wastewater twice weekly for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 and other viral targets. WBS can provide rapid data showing where the location of clustered outbreaks may be occurring (specifically. The county public health department also requested that screening of high-risk substances (fentanyl, ketamine, Narcan, heroine, etc.) to be included in WBS, thus expanding the purview of the initial surveillance project focusing solely biological agents. A concern for any surveillance program is adhering to ethical standards, regulations, and protocols. In WBS, there is no single standardized "list of rules" to guide researchers in determining risk of privacy or community stigmatization. In an effort to counter the variation in WBS as it pertains to ethical standards, we propose utilizing an ethical scoring framework tailored for WBS. This framework includes a scoresheet that can assist scientists determine the privacy and ethical risks associated with their study by introducing a quantifiable process to assess ethical compliance. Furthermore, we include a flow map outlining standard laboratory practices under the lens of how each step assists in maintaining sample fidelity, thus increasing the robustness and reliability of the data generated. SUMMARY: It is important to balance ethical standards, public health and research strategies. Application of the tools listed in this document will ensure this balance. Application of the developed ethical guidelines (Score sheet) is a practical approach. It is important to integrate vigorous data management practices. Utilization of a robust and holistic structure of the wastewater surveillance program will ensure successful outcomes.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringLaboratoriesWastewaterCOVID-19HumansSARS-CoV-2Wastewater

Identifiers

PMID40537440
PMCPMC12178841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.