ArticleKorean circulation journal2025
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion of the Coronary Artery.
Article in Korean circulation journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization: From Present to Future-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Enhancing Prognostic Accuracy in Chronic Total Occlusion: Opportunities and Challenges of Machine Learning-Based Prediction.Korean circulation journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesPrecise prediction of long-term outcomes in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the coronary artery is crucial for cardiovascular care. The recent development of advanced machine learning (ML) models has opened up new possibilities in medical prognostics. This study aimed to develop ML models and validate their performance in predicting long-term clinical outcomes in patients with CTO.
methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed 3,248 patients listed in the Asan Medical Center CTO Registry (2003-2018). Patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, or optimal medical therapy and were followed up for a median period of 5.3 years. The study population was randomly split into training (n=2,598) and test (n=650) sets. Three ML algorithms-namely, L2-penalized logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and CatBoost-were employed to develop a prognostic model for 5-year cardiac death (primary endpoint) as well as 5-year all-cause mortality and target vessel revascularization (TVR) (secondary endpoints). Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs), and feature importance was evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations values.
resultsThe three ML algorithms exhibited comparable performance in predicting 5-year cardiac death (AUC: 0.80). Additionally, these three ML algorithms successfully predicted 5-year all-cause mortality (AUC: 0.83-0.84) and TVR (AUC: 0.65-0.74), showing good predictive performance. Patient demographics and comorbidities, rather than treatment modality, were the leading predictors of outcomes.
conclusionsThe ML models are reliable in predicting 5-year clinical outcomes in patients with CTO, demonstrating their potential for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.