ArticleKorean circulation journal2025
Sex-Specific Differences in Management and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Patients With and Without Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.
Article in Korean circulation journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02985008 (SMart Angioplasty Research Team), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
SMart Angioplasty Research Team: A Multi-center, Open, REtrospective and Prospective Observational Study to Investigate Clinical oUtcomes and Efficacy of Left Ventricular Assist Device for Korean Patients With Cardiogenic Shock : RESCUE
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal Trends in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction in South Korea.Korean circulation journal · 2026Article
- The Persistent Challenge of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights From a Korean Nationwide Registry.Korean circulation journal · 2026Article
- Sex-Specific Differences in Cardiogenic Shock: Does It Still Matter?Korean circulation journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesComprehensive data on sex-based differences in the management and outcomes of patients with and without ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP) presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) remain limited. This study aimed to investigate whether clinical management and outcomes differ by sex among CS patients, stratified by underlying etiology.
methodsWe analyzed 1,247 CS patients from the RESCUE registry, a multicenter observational cohort, stratified by sex and CS etiology: ICMP (females: 276, males: 730) and non-ICMP (females: 111, males: 130). Primary outcomes included in-hospital and 12-month mortality. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and propensity-score matching were used to adjust for confounding factors.
resultsAmong ICMP patients, females were less likely to undergo coronary angiography (p=0.001), although rates of successful revascularization were similar between sexes (p=0.982). In-hospital 30-day mortality did not differ significantly between females and males in either the ICMP cohort (37.1% vs. 29.5%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.39; p=0.737) or the non-ICMP cohort (28.3% vs. 25.6%; adjusted HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.68-2.22; p=0.493). At 12 months, mortality risk remained comparable between sexes in both ICMP (46.4% vs. 37.1%; adjusted HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.57-1.17; p=0.274) and non-ICMP groups (40.1% vs. 41.3%; adjusted HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.56-1.45; p=0.685). These findings were consistent after propensity-score matching.
conclusionsThere was no significant difference in management, 12-month or in-hospital mortality between females and males, irrespective of the etiology of CS.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02985008.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.