ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2025
Use and effectiveness of directed, closed-loop communication in the operating theatre: mixed methods analysis of simulated clinical emergencies.
Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- When seconds matter - introducing a surgical salvage strategy by emergency robotic surgery: a review.Patient safety in surgery · 2026Review
- Defining Preliminary Core Nontechnical Skills for Anesthesia Crisis Management in Indonesia: An Expert Consensus from a Modified Delphi Study Emphasizing Communication and Situational Awareness.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective team performance requires clear communication. Closed-loop communication has improved outcome measures across a range of clinical contexts. We explored the use and effectiveness of directed, closed-loop communication in the operating theatre. We hypothesised that directed, closed-loop communication would increase the proportion of requested actions that were completed. We explored actions completed with closed-loop and directed communication, request type, communication efficiency, and professional differences.
methodsThe study involved a mixed methods conversational analysis of eight operating theatre emergency simulations.
resultsOf 150 requests for action, 12% used closed-loop and directed communication together and were associated with higher action completion rates than when neither or one strategy alone was used (100% vs 81%, P=0.030), 19% used closed-loop (with or without directed) communication and were associated with higher action completion rate than when closed-loop was not used (97% vs 80%, P=0.023), and 45% used directed (with or without closed-loop) communication and were not associated with a significant difference in action completion rate compared with when not used (86% vs 81%, P=0.256). We identified inefficiencies in response to requested tasks, including in time-critical tasks, such as no verbal response, repetition of request, or an initial response but no action.
conclusionsDirected, closed-loop communication in simulated operating theatre emergencies was associated with increased task completion but was infrequently used. Inefficiencies and dropped requests have implications for team performance and patient safety. Our findings support implementing context-specific interventions to improve task management in operating theatre emergencies through improved communication clarity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.